It’s October, Halloween is quickly approaching, and for some
historic sites and museums, that can mean one thing: an unbelievably busy
month!
During my more than two years at the Wellington County Museum and
Archives (WCMA) in Fergus, I worked as a Programming Assistant and had to adopt
many different roles in that position. However, when I started there in August
2015, I had no idea acting would become part of my repertoire.
The WCMA fully embraces it’s rumoured “haunted past” every
October to tell the stories of the people who lived, worked, and died when the building
was originally the County’s House of Industry and Refuge. Better known as the “Poorhouse”
in this time period, the House of Industry had approximately 1500 people pass
through its doors between when it opened in 1877 until it became the County
Home for the Aged in 1947. For the folks who died during their stay at the Poorhouse,
if their bodies were not claimed by a relative, they were buried on site. There
are 271 bodies still buried in the adjacent cemetery. For the people of
Wellington County who were destitute, sick, blind, suffering from a mental illness
or physical disability, abandoned or simply elderly with no one to help look
after them, the Poorhouse was a place of refuge. It is because of these sad
tales that many of the locals in Centre Wellington believe the house to be a haunted
hot-spot in the community.
At Halloween, everyone loves a spooky ghost story. However,
as a museum and educational site, how do you marry the popularity of haunted
entertainment with true historical stories? The WCMA does this by offering an
annual event titled “Spirit Walks”. Extensive archival research is conducted throughout
the summer months by the museum programming team to learn as much as they can about a few true
stories of individuals from the Poorhouse. These stories are then converted
into monologues and delivered by costumed actors over four nights in October.
To create the “spooky” effect, the guests are toured with a guide to visit each “character”
at various locations in the museum, in the dark, with only lantern light. And the
stories uncovered from the archival research are simply astounding. It is hard
to believe these things actually happened; you truly can’t make this stuff up!
![]() |
The Wellington County Museum and Archive's event "Spirit Walks" brings to life the stories of individuals who lived and died at the House of Industry and Refuge throughout the month of October. |
Although living in London and thoroughly busy with my Public History projects and my Research Assistantship, I have returned for my fourth
year as a costumed performer in Spirit Walks. And yes, that means driving two
hours (that’s just one way) from London to Fergus four nights in October. This year,
I play Christina Keleher, and help retell the true story of a married Irish
couple from Arthur, Ontario, who found themselves in court in 1896. The Kelehers were notorious in the community
for their loud fights and filthy living conditions. One night, after a
particularly loud argument, the neighbours informed the local Constable and
Reeve Blair that something needed to be done. Daniel Keleher was out at the
tavern when the Reeve and Constable showed up at the Keleher dwelling, and
subsequently brought Mrs. Keleher to the Poorhouse for safe refuge. Daniel
Keleher, believing his wife was kidnapped, attempted to sue the Reeve for trespassing
and kidnapping, asking $2000.00 in damages. For Spirit Walks this year, we are
retelling the story of the alleged kidnapping by recreating the court case. We have costumed actors playing Daniel Keleher,
Reeve Blair, and the Court Justice Robertson. I am volunteering my amateur acting skills and testifying as Christina Keleher.
One problem however …Christina Keleher did not actually testify
during the trial. Typically, women were represented by a male figure in court
during this period, whether a husband, brother, or father. So how do we tell
Christina’s side of the story to a modern audience, while recreating the court
case in as historically accurate manner as possible? We take dramatic liberties.
In my previous post, I talked about my interview podcast with
War of 1812 re-enactor, Stephanie Vaillant, who discussed how re-enactors use historical
inaccuracy as an educational tool. Stephanie is a modern woman in 2018 who, as
a hobby, enjoys participating as a soldier in battlefield re-enactments. However,
some viewers of the re-enactments critique this as being historically inaccurate.
Of course, modern women should not be barred from enjoying and participating in
this hobby, therefore Stephanie stated that “vignettes”, or short dramatic
skits, are effective to explain inaccuracies and educate the public at these events. She
argued that the vignette can be used to explain what would happen to women if
caught pretending to be soldiers in the early 1800s, thereby offering education
as well as allowing modern women to freely participate.
This still leaves the question, is it okay for historical re-enactments to take dramatic liberties
in order to tell stories about the past? I argue the answer is yes, especially when the audience walks away aware of the liberties taken for educational purposes.
The way Spirit Walks navigates around this issue is by having the tour leader
explain that some artistic license was taken in order to retell the story in
its entirety to a modern audience. After
each character testifies in the recreated court case, the audience participants
are given the opportunity to act as the jury and decide how the damages should
be awarded. Upon hearing Mrs. Keleher's testimony, the audience members have so far primarily
voted not to award Daniel Keleher any money, due to the evidence that it was clearly
an abusive situation and Mrs. Keleher chose to leave the home for her own safety. The actual verdict from 1896 is then revealed to the
audience. Although shocking to us today, Justice Robertson impressed on the jury, in a
racially prejudiced manner, that because the couple was Irish, they may have actually
enjoyed and preferred that wretched standard of living and fighting with each
other. The real jury then awarded Daniel Keleher $110.00 in damages for the
kidnapping of his wife and trespassing on his property.
The participants at Spirit Walks, upon learning that Mrs.
Keleher didn’t actually testify, have the opportunity to ponder what the
trial experience would have been like without her testimony, and if that would
have changed their minds about the way they voted. In the reverse sense, would the
inclusion or allowance of Mrs. Keleher’s testimony have changed the verdict in 1896?
The next Spirit Walks are coming up this Thursday and
Friday, at 7:00pm and 8:30pm. For those who cannot make it to Fergus, there
are similar experiences offered in London at historic sites such as Eldon House and Fanshawe Pioneer Village.
Next week, in the spirit of Halloween, I’ll be blogging
about our Public History group project, a historical walking tour in downtown London
detailing the infamous 1898 murder case and criminal trial of Marion “Peg-Leg” Brown. Again, you can’t
make this stuff up!
An update... our historical acting found it's way into the Erin Advocate newspaper:
https://www.southwesternontario.ca/whatson-story/8981042-wellington-county-museum-offers-historical-tales-in-spooky-setting/
An update... our historical acting found it's way into the Erin Advocate newspaper:
https://www.southwesternontario.ca/whatson-story/8981042-wellington-county-museum-offers-historical-tales-in-spooky-setting/
Hey Katie! I personally love the month of October and all the various events associated with it. I typically celebrate with scary movies and popcorn but it is so exciting to know there is so much programming out there. I don't know that I am brave enough quite yet to take any tours but I will definitely be following along next week to read your take on Peg Leg!
ReplyDeleteHi Katie! We have a very similar theatrical production at Pickering Museum Village, the living history museum that I worked at, also called "Spirit Walk". These also take place in the fall at night and are lit by lantern to set the mood. Ours tells the story of the Rebellion of 1837 in Upper Canada, an event that numerous locals had taken part in. While helping with planning and setting up for many years I had the opportunity to see it for the first time this year and it was amazing! The acting expanded my understanding of the political circumstances that led to the rebellion. Like your Spirit Walk, we also had to take some artistic liberties that I agree are okay as long as the audience understands that this has happened. I really like the element in your show where the audience is able to decide the verdict in the case. The fact that they often rule opposite to the historic ruling speaks to the changes over time. I was wondering what the most difficult part of playing a historical figure has been for you? Good luck in your last few shows! -Rachel
ReplyDeleteHi Rachel! I was wondering if you had a similar experience at the Pickering Museum! I think I would really enjoy that tour as well. As far as the acting goes, I find it really enjoyable so long as the audience "buys in". It is evident when the group is engaged and enjoying the tours, and definitely helps with acting. One group was so into the trial, when the "Judge" made his final observation about the couple being Irish, everyone gasped in shock. It was fantastic, that's exactly what we wanted! A few ladies also came to talk to me after the tours about how they appreciated my giving Mrs. Keheler a voice. On the reverse side, if it seems like the audience is not engaged and unenthusiastic, that is extremely difficult. It makes us question either what we are doing wrong, what we could do better, or even if we should be performing and recreating the stories at all. Thankfully this is rare, and more often than not the folks who come out enjoy the history tour through the museum, the "spook", and the overall experience. :)
Delete